Mr. Sixty Percent?

According to the Washington Post, Barack Obama has already failed to vote 170 times during the current Congress. He has missed 37.9% of the votes. When he voted, he stood with our party 96.4% of the time.

Therefore, he's only really a Democratic Senator 59.86% of the time. In his campaign, Obama is trying to convince us he is the most capable candidate who can effect change, but his record suggests otherwise. Either he is suggesting that we don't need an agent of change 40.14% of the time, or he just doesn't care that much.

On the one hand, Hillary Clinton has 35 years of experience. Her experience and accomplishments speak for themselves. On the other hand, we have Barack Obama who has shown he moderately cares about change. We cannot afford to elect Mr. Sixty Percent. There is too much at stake.

If actions speak louder than words, inaction is a deafening scream. NOBAMA!

NO WAY. NOBAMA.

While we have a viable, experienced candidate in Hillary Clinton, some Democratic leaders are trying to force Barack Obama on us. While his message of "hope" is appealing, we cannot afford to elect him as our president in 2008. Remember what happened last time our country elected a guy with no White House experience? We need an experienced leader who can get things done immediately.

Still, some leading Democrats insist Obama is our guy. To this, I say: